Skip to main content.

Hiring a cancer survivor

Hiring a cancer survivor

Picture of Debra  Sherman

The most recent employment report from the U.S. Labor Department showed the job market remained tough in January. If it’s difficult for healthy individuals to get a job, what is it like for cancer survivors?

Personally, I’m not looking for a job. When I was diagnosed with lung cancer about a year ago, my editors and I came up with the idea that I should write a blog about all aspects of cancer.

I had not focused on what it would be like conducting a job search with cancer as my co-pilot until I read a recent LinkedIn post: “If you think it is tough finding work for the average Joe, imagine what it is like for the cancer survivor. How do you explain the gap in your resume? You lie of course.”

Cancer survivors are supposed to be legally protected by state and federal laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act. Prospective employers cannot ask about a job candidate’s health. So in theory, cancer survivors should not have a problem, but some say there’s an underlying bias against them. It’s not hard to see why. The employer might wonder whether the cancer survivor will take too much time off work for doctor’s appointments, or a lingering setback that might cause more severe job performance problems.

No one who took part in the subsequent online LinkedIn discussion was of the opinion that lying was the best policy. Rather, some commented it might work to an applicant’s benefit to be open about their cancer.

“I use this as an opportunity to show leadership and honesty,” said one. “I never wait for it to be asked, I bring it up. I think it shows that you are perfectly confident that it is something that has made me a better candidate through the experience.”

Another added, “If the employer does not want to understand then you do not want to be working for them anyway. I would hire a cancer survivor over and above anyone because if they are sitting across the room from me in an interview or on the phone for the interview I know they are fighters!”

There were only job seekers participating in this discussion, and no companies or head hunters, something a couple people pointed out, so I called Carol Watkins, the chief Human Resources Officer at Cardinal Health, the health care giant with 2013 sales in excess of $100 billion. She said she has hired high-level executives who she knew had cancer. Watkins, a breast cancer survivor herself, said in some cases, she saw a job candidate’s cancer as an asset because their experience gave them a knowledge that could be helpful in the job.

Watkins said that even outside the health care industry, she thinks there is not a negative bias against cancer survivors.

Surviving cancer, she added, “shows resiliency, determination, a sense of optimism, so I would never recommend that they don’t tell the truth on their resume.

“I think where it gets dicey is when they are going through cancer treatment and they say they need a month off,” she added.

Watkins said she thinks corporate America and more people in general are more compassionate than many people assume. Survival rates have increased so drastically over the years that people are accustomed to seeing people living with the disease. Those two factors have made it easier on cancer survivors looking for a job.

Jakob Franzen, Senior Director of People and Organizational Development at Livestrong Foundation, concurred, saying it’s never a good idea to lie on a resume.

“Any time an HR (executive) sees a gap in a resume, they are going to be curious,” Franzen said. “But that’s their story to tell. They get to own it.”

Livestrong is a non-profit organization that serves cancer patients, particularly those who cannot get services anywhere else, and therefore the organization would be more sympathetic to cancer survivors.

Frazen estimates that 15 to 20 percent of its employees are cancer survivors. While that may make sense for an organization devoted to cancer survival, it also is indicative that a functioning workplace can be thoroughly populated with people have have had cancer.

“The focus should be about the skills and what they bring to the table,” Franzen said. “What can you do for me? To own the conversation, you’ve got to answer that question.”

This post originally ran in "Cancer in Context" and has been use with permission from Thompson Reuters.

Image by Aiden Jones via Flickr


Picture of

Perhaps the "underlying bias" some cancer survivors feel is really age bias. As a cancer survivor, I have not felt bias over my health but I have felt a lot of age bias.

Picture of

I agree that age bias is a serious problem, unless you are applying for a job in senior management, when being over 50 is considered OK, (but not over 60.) As for cancer survivors, employers worry about their health insurance costs (similar to the AOL exec's recent blaming of premature infants born to staff members.) Almost never can this be proven, although a newspaper exec did once tell a job applicant (my friend) that she couldn't hire him, becuz the company wanted to get people in their 20s who could be molded!


The nation’s overdose epidemic has entered a devastating new phase. Drugs laced with fentanyl and even more poisonous synthetics have flooded the streets, as the crisis spreads well beyond the rural, largely white communities that initially drew attention. The death rate is escalating twice as fast among Black people than among white people. This webinar will give journalists deep insights, fresh story ideas and practical tips for covering an epidemic that killed more than 107,000 people in the U.S. last year. Sign-up here!


Follow Us



CHJ Icon