Skip to main content.

Guns and restraining orders in California

Guns and restraining orders in California

Picture of Monica Lopez
An altar outside of IV Deli where Christopher Ross Michaels-Martinez was shot in 2014.
(Photo by Monica Lopez)

It happened about 10 minutes into the interview, according to the transcript. 

Just after the introductions, notes, and having settled into a conversational flow with San Diego’s city attorney, the director of communications entered the room while pantomiming the sign for “time out.”

“We have an active shooter in the building and we need to go,” he said.

Thankfully, it was a false alarm, which we learned after we had sheltered in various locations. But the irony is that the interview with the city attorney was about a law intended to prevent exactly this type of scenario. 

My California Fellowship project asked how the state’s red flag law — the Gun Violence Restraining Order — was being used and what its impacts had been in preventing shootings where would-be shooters had exhibited concerning behavior. 

Rather than focusing on mass shootings alone, I chose to look at the use of the law as a tool in situations of everyday gun violence: suicide, homicide and intimate partner violence. However, the story had to be told in less than 29 minutes, so I narrowed the focus and settled on intimate partner violence for several reasons. 

There are some states that do not require people with domestic violence convictions to surrender their firearms or prohibit them from possessing a gun. California does. 

In addition, California’s Gun Violence Restraining Order was modeled in the image of the state’s Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO).

Thirdly, I wanted to find out whether this new twist on an old legal tool could uniquely help a group who were not the intended primary benefactors of the law. 

Even with DVRO firearms prohibitions, women in California were still being shot and killed by their abusers. Could this new restraining order law bolster protections for women in this situation?

I needed a big picture view. Were people using it, and to what degree? Was it in fact preventing mass shootings, suicides, and other forms of gun violence? How did they measure success?  How were the laws being enforced? Who had concerns about the law? 

I reached out to representatives from a number of state and municipal agencies, some of whom agreed to fulfill my information requests, but did not follow through. In the end, I submitted California Public Records Act requests, which I wish I had done much earlier.

Leave A Comment


The wave of attacks against Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders has been emotionally gutting for these communities. In our next webinar, we’ll examine the impact of the crisis on the mental health of Asian Americans, especially the women who are often targeted. Join us for a deep discussion to inform your coverage of the crisis and broader reporting on AAPI communities. Sign-up here!

As public health officials like to say, "COVID-19 isn't done with us." And journalists know that we're not done with COVID-19. Apply now for five days of stimulating discussions on the pandemic's disproportionate impact on people of color -- plus reporting and engagement grants of $2k-$10k and five months of mentoring while you work on an ambitious project.

Are you passionate about helping journalists understand and illuminate the social factors that contribute to health and health disparities at a time when COVID-19 has highlighted the costs of such inequities? Looking to play a big role in shaping journalism today in the United States? The USC Center for Health Journalism seeks an enterprising and experienced journalism leader for our new position of “Manager of Projects.” 



Follow Us



CHJ Icon