Image

Barbara Feder Ostrov

Articles

<p>President Obama’s support for a bill <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/01/us/politics/01health.html?scp=4&amp;s… would let states opt out of national health reform mandates</a> early to come up with their own plans has been described variously as <a href="http://blogs.ajc.com/jamie-dupree-washington-insider/2011/03/01/health-…;“a bomb,”</a> a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/28/AR20110…;“major concession”</a> to reform’s critics, or <a href="http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/02/obama-calls-republican-health…;“calling the Republicans’ bluff.” </a>&nbsp;</p><p>But is it any single one of these things? Not so much. Here’s some context and a look at some analysis of Obama’s highly-publicized support for the <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/11/have_scott_brown_an… state waiver bill</a>, which he announced to the nation’s state governors on Monday.</p>

<p>Why does journalism matter? The National Press Foundation will award an iPad to the person who can best answer that weighty question in a 140-character tweet. &nbsp;</p>